CHARACTERISTICS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SPATIAL COGNITION
Commentary on Bryant on Space

Abstract

Bryant (1992) proposes a unitary spatial representation system (SRS) constructs spatial knowledge representations based on input from either linguistic descriptions of environments or perceptual information acquired while directly experiencing environments, or both. In this commentary, I discuss some of the characteristics of the spatial-cognitive system that Bryant has touched upon, particularly those dealing with large-scale, or environmental, spaces. Attempts to build a common framework for understanding both spatial and linguistic cognition are interesting and laudable, especially if one believes that linguistic cognition evolved from nonlinguistic cognitive systems such as those responsible for spatial cognition. In addition to examining the spatial representations derived from linguistic descriptions, much of value could be gained by examining the linguistic descriptions derived from spatial representations, either external or internal.

Keywords

References

• Book, A., & Garling, T. (1981). Maintenance of orientation during locomotion in unfamiliar environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 7: 995-1006.
• Bryant, D. J. (1992). A spatial representation system in humans. PSYCOLOQUY 3(16) space.1
• Hanley, G. L., & Levine, M. (1983). Spatial problem solving: The integration of independently learned cognitive maps. Memory & Cognition 11: 415-422.
• Hart, R. A., & Moore, G. T. (1973). The development of spatial cognition: A review. In R. M. Downs & D. Stea (Eds.), Image and environment (pp. 246-288). Chicago: Aldine.
• Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., Golledge, R. G., Cicinelli, J. G., Doherty, S., & Pellegrino, J. W. (1990). Acquisition of route and survey knowledge in the absence of vision. Journal of Motor Behavior 22: 19-43.
• Klein, W. (1982). Local deixis in route directions. In R. Jarvella & W. Klein (Eds.), Speech, place, & action (pp. 161- 182). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
• Kozlowski, L. T., & Bryant, R. J. (1977). Sense of direction, spatial orientation and cognitive maps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3: 590-598.
• Lindberg, E., & Garling, T. (1983). Acquisition of different types of locational information in cognitive maps: Automatic or effortful processing? Psychological Research 45: 19-38.
• Linde, C., & Labov, W. (1975). Spatial networks as a site for the study of language and thought. Language 51: 924-939.
• Montello, D. R., & Pick, H. L. (1992, April 11). Integrating knowledge of large-scale spaces above and below ground. Paper presented at the Environmental Design Research Association Conference (EDRA 23) in Boulder, Colorado.
• Montello, D. R., & Presson, C. C. (1992). Movement and orientation in surrounding and imaginal spaces. Manuscript submitted for publication.
• Palij, M. (1987). On the varieties of spatial knowledge: Cognitive maps, imagined terrains, and other representational forms. Unpublished manuscript, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY.
• Rieser, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 15: 1157-1165.
• Siegel, A. W., & White, S. H. (1975). The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior, Vol. 10 (pp. 9-55). New York: Academic Press.
• Smyth, M. M., & Kennedy, J. E. (1982). Orientation and spatial representation within multiple frames of reference. British Journal of Psychology 73: 527-535.
• Sullivan, C., Montello, D. R., Pick, H. L., & Somerville, S. C. (1992). Integrating spatial knowledge. Manuscript in preparation.