THOUGHTS ABOUT THE MINIMALIST HYPOTHESIS
Commentary on Garnham on Reading-Inference

Abstract

The minimalist position offers a good summary of much, but not all, of the data on inferencing. It is, however, to be faulted for being virtually impossible to falsify. Although minimalism provides a good summary of the data that was available at the time of its formulation, it should be noted that many new studies suggest that occurrence of inferences may not be as minimal as indicated by initial data.

Keywords

References

• Bransford, J.D., Barclay, J.R., & Franks, J.J. (1972). Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 193-209.
• Garnham, A. (1992). Minimalism versus constructionism: A false dichotomy in theories of inference during reading. PSYCOLOQUY, 3(63) reading-inference-1.1
• Keenan, J.M., Baillet, S.D., & Brown, P. (1984). The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 115-126.
• McKoon, G. & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440-466.
• Murray, J.D., Klin, C.M., & Myers, J.L. (in press). Forward inferences in narrative text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition.
• Noordman, L.G.M. & Vonk, W. (1992). Reader's knowledge and the control of inference in reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7, 373-391.
• Potts, G.R. (1974). Storing and retrieving information about ordered relationships. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 431-439.
• Sanford, A.J., & Garrod, S.C. (1981). Understanding written language: Explorations in comprehension beyond the sentence. New York: Wiley.
• Suh, S., & Trabasso, T. (1988). Convergent evidence on inferences during comprehension of text. Paper presented at meeting of the Psychonomics Society in Chicago; November, 1988.
• Whitney, P., Ritchie, B.G., & Crane, R.S. (in press). The effect of foregrounding on readers' use of predictive inferences. Memory & Cognition.