Rick Grush (1993) Van Brakel's Position is Perfectly Coherent
. Psycoloquy: 4(24) Frame Problem (8)
Versions: ASCII formatted
Psycoloquy 4(24): Van Brakel's Position is Perfectly Coherent
VAN BRAKEL'S POSITION IS PERFECTLY COHERENT
Commentary on Fetzer on van Brakel on Ford & Hayes on the Frame Problem
Rick Grush
Department of Philosophy
University of California, San Diego
La Jolla, CA 92037
rgrush@sdcc3.ucsd.edu
Abstract
Fetzer's reasons for disputing van Brakel's (1992)
position are based on misunderstanding of van Brakel's arguments.
Keywords
Frame-problem, artificial intelligence, temporal logics,
independent persistence, attention, Hume, dynamic frames,
qualification problem.
References
- Fetzer, J.H. (1993) Commentary on van Brakel on Ford & Hayes on the Frame-Problem. PSYCHOLOQUY 4(14) frame-problem.4
- Ford, K.M. and P.J. Hayes (1991) Reasoning Agents in a Dynamic World: The Frame Problem, Greenwich: JAI Press.
- Hayes, P.J. (1992) Summary of "Reasoning Agents in a Dynamic World: The Frame Problem" (Ford & Hayes 1991, Eds.) PSYCOLOQUY 3(59) frame-problem.1
- van Brakel, J. (1992) The Complete Description of the Frame Problem. PSYCOLOQUY 3(60) frame-problem.2