Selmer Bringsjord (1995) Computationalism is Doomed, and we can Come to Know it . Psycoloquy: 6(10) Robot Consciousness (5)
Versions: ASCII formatted
Psycoloquy 6(10): Computationalism is Doomed, and we can Come to Know it

COMPUTATIONALISM IS DOOMED, AND WE CAN COME TO KNOW IT
Reply to Scholl on Robot-Consciousness

Selmer Bringsjord
Dept. of Philosophy, Psychology & Cognitive Science
Department of Computer Science
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Troy, NY 12180

selmer@rpi.edu

Abstract

Scholl (1994) claims in his review of What Robots Can & Can't Be (ROBOTS; 1992, 1994) that my six-prong attack on what I call the Person Building Project (the engineering side of Strong AI) begs the question. Scholl does an admirable job of recapitulating the computationalist party line, but his position is plagued by a failure of imagination, a fatally flawed method, and, ironically enough, repeated instances of the fallacy of begging the question.

Keywords

behaviorism, Chinese Room Argument, cognition, consciousness, finite automata, free will, functionalism, introspection, mind, story generation, Turing machines, Turing Test.

References