Roslyn Holly Fitch (1995) Estrogen and Sexual Differentiation: It's in the Timing . Psycoloquy: 6(24) Sex Brain (4)
Versions: ASCII formatted
Psycoloquy 6(24): Estrogen and Sexual Differentiation: It's in the Timing

ESTROGEN AND SEXUAL DIFFERENTIATION: IT'S IN THE TIMING
Reply to Rucklidge on Fitch & Denenberg on Sex-Brain

Roslyn Holly Fitch
Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience
Rutgers University
197 University Ave.
Newark, NJ 07102

Victor H. Denenberg
Biobehavioral Sciences Graduate Degree Program
University of Connecticut
Storrs, CT 06269-4154

holly@axon.rutgers.edu dberg@uconnvm.uconn.edu

Abstract

In asserting that a masculinizing role of estrogen (derived via intracellular aromatization) is paradoxically incompatible with a feminizing role of estrogen, Rucklidge (1995) has overlooked the critical temporal distinction between the sensitive windows for these effects. The fact that the neural substrate (including but not limited to estrogen receptor populations) is profoundly different in P10 female rats, combined with the fact that physiological levels of ovarian estrogen are much lower than those used to exogenously induce masculinization, it should not be surprising that estrogen could exert different effects (masculinizing versus feminizing) on males versus females in two different developmental time-frames.

Keywords

corpus callosum, development, estrogen, feminization, ovaries, sensitive period.

References