William C. Hoffman (1998) Are Neural Nets a Valid Model of Cognition?
. Psycoloquy: 9(12) Connectionist Explanation (9)
Versions: ASCII formatted
Psycoloquy 9(12): Are Neural Nets a Valid Model of Cognition?
ARE NEURAL NETS A VALID MODEL OF COGNITION?
Commentary on Green on Connectionist-Explanation
William C. Hoffman
Institute for Topological Psychology
2591 W. Camino Llano, Tucson, AZ, USA 85742-9074
willhof@worldnet.att.net
Abstract
Connectionist models purport to model cognitive
neuropsychology by means of adaptive linear algebra applied to
point neurons. As a theory of cognition, this approach is deficient
in several aspects: noncovergence in neurobiological real-time;
omission of two topological structures fundamental to the
information processing psychology on which connectionist models are
based; omission of the local structure of neurobiological
processing; omission of actual neuron morphologies, cortical
cytoarchitecture, and the cortical orientation response; the
inability to perform memory retrieval from point-neuron "weights"
in neurobiological real-time; and failure to implement
psychological constancy. Cognitive processing by neuronal flows is
offered as a viable alternative. Finally, neural nets fail Hempel's
test of empirical and systematic import.
Keywords
connectionism, neural nets, neuropsychology, cognition,
perception, computational models, philosophy of science, memory,
psychological constancy, symmetric difference.
References
- Anderson, J. A., Silverstein, J. W., Ritz, S. A., & Jones, R. S. (1977) Distinctive features, categorical perception, and probability learning: Some applications of a neural model. Psychological Review 84: 413-451.
- Churchland, P. (1996) Reconstructing consciousness. Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
- Green, CD. (1998) Are Connectionist Models Theories of Cognition? PSYCOLOQUY 9(4) ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Psycoloquy/1998.volume.9/ psyc.98.9.04.connectionist-explanation.1.green
- Hempel, C. G. (1952) Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science. University of Chicago Press.
- Hempel, C. G. (1966) Philosophy of Natural Science. Prentice-Hall
- Henle, M. (1979) A Combinatorial Introduction to Topology. Freeman
- Herlihy, M. & Shavit, N. (Dec 1994) Applications of algebraic topology to concurrent computation. SIAM News, 10-12.
- Hoffman, W. C. (1980) Subjective geometry and geometric psychology. Internat. Journal of Mathematical Modelling 1: 349-367.
- Hoffman, W. C. (1985) Some reasons why algebraic topology is important in neuropsychology: Perceptual and cognitive systems as fibrations. Internat. J. of Man-Machine Studies 22: 613-650.
- Hoffman, W. C. (1994) Equivariant dynamical systems: A formal model for generation of arbitrary shapes. In: Shape in Picture, O. Ying-Lie et al. (Eds.). Springer-Verlag.
- Hoffman, W. C. (1997) Mind and the Geometry of Systems. In: Two Sciences of Mind, S. O'Nualla'in, P. McKevitt, & E. Mac Aogain (Eds.). John Benjamins.
- Hopfield, J. (1982) Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proc. National Acad. of Sciences 70: 2554-2558.
- Kostrikin, A. I. & Shafarevich, I. R. (Eds.) Algebra I. Springer-Verlag.
- Lau, D. (1992) Neural Networks: Theoretical Foundations and Analyses. Institution of Electrical & Electronic Engineers.
- Minsky, M. & Papert, S. (1969) Perceptrons: An introduction to computational geometry. Cambridge MA: MIT Press (Reissued in an Expanded Edition, 1988).