William C. Hoffman (1998) Are Neural Nets a Valid Model of Cognition? . Psycoloquy: 9(12) Connectionist Explanation (9)
Versions: ASCII formatted
Psycoloquy 9(12): Are Neural Nets a Valid Model of Cognition?

ARE NEURAL NETS A VALID MODEL OF COGNITION?
Commentary on Green on Connectionist-Explanation

William C. Hoffman
Institute for Topological Psychology
2591 W. Camino Llano, Tucson, AZ, USA 85742-9074

willhof@worldnet.att.net

Abstract

Connectionist models purport to model cognitive neuropsychology by means of adaptive linear algebra applied to point neurons. As a theory of cognition, this approach is deficient in several aspects: noncovergence in neurobiological real-time; omission of two topological structures fundamental to the information processing psychology on which connectionist models are based; omission of the local structure of neurobiological processing; omission of actual neuron morphologies, cortical cytoarchitecture, and the cortical orientation response; the inability to perform memory retrieval from point-neuron "weights" in neurobiological real-time; and failure to implement psychological constancy. Cognitive processing by neuronal flows is offered as a viable alternative. Finally, neural nets fail Hempel's test of empirical and systematic import.

Keywords

connectionism, neural nets, neuropsychology, cognition, perception, computational models, philosophy of science, memory, psychological constancy, symmetric difference.

References