INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES WITHIN HUMAN GROUPS
Commentary on Caporael on Group-Selection

Abstract

Caporael's (1995) target article discusses four topics in evolutionary psychology. Of these, the most useful is her approach to human social relations and her categorization of human groups into four "core configurations" that vary in size and have different functions. The least useful is her attack on behavioral genetics. Caporael's theory does a good job of accounting for the assimilatory aspects of group membership -- the fact that the members of groups tend to acquire shared patterns of behavior and cognition. However, the theory does not take sufficient account of within-group individual differences.

Keywords

References

• Asch, S.E. (1956) Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs 70 (9, Whole No. 416).
• Brewer, M.B. & Caporael, L.R. (1990) Selfish genes versus selfish people: Sociobiology as origin myth. Motivation and Emotion 14: 237-242.
• Caporael, L.R. (1995) Sociality: Coordinating bodies, minds, and groups. PSYCOLOQUY 6(1) group-selection.1.caporael.
• Caporael, L.R., Dawes, R.M., Orbell, J.M., & van de Kragt, A.J.C. (1989) Selfishness examined: Cooperation in the absence of egoistic incentives. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12: 683-739.
• Carson, R.C. (1989) Personality. Annual Review of Psychology 40: 227-248.
• Harris, J.R. (1995) Where is the child's environment? A group socialization theory of development. Psychological Review 102: 458-489.
• Plomin, R. & Daniels, D. (1987) Why are children in the same family so different from one another? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10, 1-60.
• Scarr, S. (1992) Developmental theories for the 1990s: Development and individual differences. Child Development 63: 1-19.