Csaba Pleh and Zsuzsa Kaldy (1996) Where Does Story Grammar Come From?
. Psycoloquy: 7(34) Language Network (14)
Versions: ASCII formatted
Psycoloquy 7(34): Where Does Story Grammar Come From?
WHERE DOES STORY GRAMMAR COME FROM?
Book Review of Miikkulainen on Language-Network
Csaba Pleh and Zsuzsa Kaldy
Department of General Psychology
Eoetvoes Lorand University
P.O. Box 4 H-1378
Budapest, Hungary
pleh@izabell.elte.hu
Kaldy@izabell.elte.hu
Abstract
This commentary discusses some problems that we have
encountered with Miikkulainen's language processing model, DISCERN,
described in his book, Subsymbolic Natural Language Processing: An
Integrated Model of Scripts, Lexicon, Memory (1993). First,
DISCERN uses grammatical analysis in an unclarified manner. It
assumes certain notions like Cases without giving them a
connectionist account, and also presupposes a preliminary syntactic
analysis. Neither the categories nor the temporal relations are
connected to research on human parsing. Second, the relations
between sentence parsing and story parsing are left unclear. Third,
the story material used is extremely constrained. These constraints
(one actor, one plot, etc.) are not trivial and seriously limit the
scope of the model for human story processing.
Keywords
computational modeling, connectionism, distributed neural
networks, episodic memory, lexicon, natural language processing,
scripts.
References
- Altmann, G.T.M. and Steedman, M. (1988). Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition, 30, 191-238.
- Clark, A. (1989). Microcognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Clark, A. (1993). Associative Engines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Carlson, G.N. and Tannenhaus, M.K. (eds.) (1989). Linguistic structure in language processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
- Carlson and Tannenhaus (1988). Thematic roles and language comprehension. Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 21, 263-288.
- Forster, K. (1979). Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In: Cooper, W.E. and Walker, E.C.T. (Eds.): Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Studies Presented to Merrill Garrett. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Frazier, L. and Clifton, C., Jr. (1996). Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Frazier, L. and Fodor, J.D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two stage parsing model. Cognition, 6, 291-325.
- Hofstadter, D.R. (1979). Goedel, Escher, Bach. New York: Basic Books.
- McClelland, J.L. and Kawamoto, A.H. (1986). Mechanisms of sentence processing: Assigning roles to constituents. In: McClelland, J.L. and Rumelhart, D. E. (Eds.): Parallel Distributed Processing. Vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 272-325.
- McClelland, J.L. and Taraban, R. (1989). Sentence comprehension: A Parallel Distributed processing approach. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 287-335.
- Miikkulainen, R. (1993) Subsymbolic Natural Language Processing: An Integrated Model of Scripts, Lexicon, Memory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Miikkulainen, R. (1994) Precis of: Subsymbolic Natural Language Processing: An Integrated Model of Scripts, Lexicon, Memory. PSYCOLOQUY 5(46) language-network.1.miikkulainen.
- Schank, R. C. (1982). Dynamic Memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Tannenhaus, M.K., Carlson, G. and Trueswell, J.C. (1989). The role of thematic structures in interpretation and parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 211-234.
- Taraban, R. and McClelland, J.L. (1988). Constituent structure and thematic role assignment in sentence processing: Influences of content-based expectations. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 597-632.