CAN MECHANISTIC EXPLANATORY CONCEPTS BE APPLIED TO PART-WHOLE
PERCEPTION?
Commentary on Latimer & Stevens on Part-Whole-Perception

Abstract

Latimer & Stevens (1997) propose making order out of the prevailing disorder surrounding the terms "whole" and "part" by applying a conceptual framework developed by Rescher & Oppenheim (1955). The basic argument of the present commentary is that this framework is not suitable to explain the perception of part-whole because it is nothing other than a reflection and formalization of the physical system, which differs fundamentally from the system of human behavior. Whereas physical properties are founded on basic and natural units of measurement, psychological properties are not based on such measurement units.

Keywords

References

• Campbell, N. R. (1953). What is Science? New York: Dover.
• Coombs, C. H., Dawes, R. M., and Tversky, A. (1970). Mathematical psychology: An elementary introduction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Diamond, R. and Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107-117.
• Hempel, C. G. and Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15, 135-175.
• Latimer, C. and Stevens, C. (1997). Some remarks on wholes, parts and their perception. PSYCOLOQUY 8(13) part-whole-perception.1.latimer.
• Michell, J. (1990). An introduction to the logic of psychological measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lea.
• Penry, J. (1971a). Looking at faces and remembering them: A guide to facial identification. London: Blek Books.
• Penry, J. (1971b). Photofit kit. Leeds: John Waddington.
• Rakover, S. S. (1990). Metapsycholoyg: Missing links in behavior, mind and science. New York: Solomon/Paragon.
• Rakover, S. S. (1994). On the relationship between a face and its parts. Unpublished manuscript.
• Rakover, S. S. (1997). Can psychology provide a coherent account of human behavior? A proposed multiexplanation-model theory. Behavior and Philosophy 25, 43-76.
• Rakover, S. S. and Teucher, B. (1997). Facial inversion effects: Parts and whole relationship. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 752-761.
• Rescher, N. and Oppenheim, P. (1955). Logical analysis of Gestalt concept. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 6, 89-106.
• Salmon, W. C. (1989). Four decades of scientific explanation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.