Christopher D. Green (1998) Higher Functional Properties do not Solve Connectionism's Problems
. Psycoloquy: 9(25) Connectionist Explanation (22)
Versions: ASCII formatted
Psycoloquy 9(25): Higher Functional Properties do not Solve Connectionism's Problems
HIGHER FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES DO NOT SOLVE CONNECTIONISM'S PROBLEMS
Reply to Goldsmith on Connectionist-Explanation
Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3
Canada
http://www.yorku.ca/faculty/academic/christo
christo@yorku.ca
Abstract
Goldsmith (1998) argues that I (Green 1998a) am wrong
in asserting that nodes and connections are the theoretical
entities of connectionist theories. I reply that if he is right,
then connectionist theory is not connectionist after all. I also
comment briefly on Seidenberg's (1993) approach to the
interpretation of connectionist research, and on the issue of the
proper distinction to be drawn between theories and models.
Keywords
artificial intelligence, cognition, computer modelling,
connectionism, epistemology, explanation, methodology, neural nets,
philosophy of science, theory.
References
- Green, C.D. (1998a) Are connectionist models theories of cognition? PSYCOLOQUY 9(4) ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Psycoloquy/1998.volume.9/ psyc.98.9.04.connectionist-explanation.1.green
- Green, C.D. (1998b) Does localist connectionism solve the problem? Reply to Grainger & Jacobs on Connectionist-Explanation. PSYCOLOQUY 9(14) ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Psycoloquy/1998.volume.9/ psyc.98.9.14.connectionist-explanation.11.green
- Green, C.D. (1998c) Statistical analyses do not solve connectionism's problem: Reply to Medler & Dawson on Connectionist-Explanation. PSYCOLOQUY 9(15) ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Psycoloquy/1998.volume.9/ psycoloquy.98.9.15.connectionist-explanation.12.green
- Green, C.D. (1998d) Connectionist nets are only good models if we know what they model: Reply to Lee, Van Heuveln, Morrison, & Dietrich. PSYCOLOQUY 9(23) ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Psycoloquy/1998.volume.9/ psycoloquy.98.9.23.connectionist-explanation.20.green
- Goldsmith (1998) Connectionist modeling and theorizing: Who does the explaining and how? Commentary on Green on connectionist-explanation PSYCOLOQUY 9(18) ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Psycoloquy/1998.volume.9/ psycoloquy.98.9.18.connectionist-explanation.15.green
- Lee, C., van Heuveln, B. Morrison, C.T., & Dietrich, E. (1998) Why connectionist nets are good models: Commentary on Green on connectionist-explanation PSYCOLOQUY 9(17) ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Psycoloquy/1998.volume.9/ psycoloquy.98.9.17.connectionist-explanation.14.green
- Medler, D. A., & Dawson, M. R. W. (1998). Connectionism and cognitive theories. PSYCOLOQUY 9(11) ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Psycoloquy/1998.volume.9/ psyc.98.9.11.connectionist-explanation.8.medler.
- Seidenberg, M. & McClelland, J. (1989). A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
- Seidenberg, M. (1993). Connectionist models and cognitive science. Psychological Science, 4, 228-235.